Key Differences
In short — GeForce 820M outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce 820M is 600 days older than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 45 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 820M - 4 vs 2 GB
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GeForce 820M
Mobile • Mar 21st, 2015
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 820M | vs | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.83 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
| 901 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
