The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6750 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €649.81 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 93% cheaper – €45.99 vs €695.80
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 31 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6750 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 2300% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€52.66
In Stock
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€695.8
6%
Value, €/FPS
€5.43/FPS
21%
Buy on Amazon
€695.80
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€481.91
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€735.99
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
4%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.31 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 166.4 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 416 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 13.31 TFLOPS |
