Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 1198 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 150% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 125 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - €1.74 vs €2.84 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
65%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Buy for €141.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
8%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
8%
Arc A750 | vs | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$289 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |