The Arc A350M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 25 vs 355 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 7900 XTX
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Nov 3rd, 2022
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
132
100%
Price, €
€1086.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.27/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,086.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,033.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,331.49
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€977.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€999.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,023.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,992.51
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,299.99
In Stock
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
6%
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Nov 3rd, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
479.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
959.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
61.39 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 3rd, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Navi III |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 355 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 960 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 479.6 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 959.2 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 61.39 TFLOPS |
