In Battlefield 6, the Arc A350M is much slower than the Radeon RX 6800. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Arc A350M
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Mar 30, 2022 vs Oct 28, 2020
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 25 vs 250 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
Radeon RX 6800
- Up to 608% faster in Battlefield 6 – 92 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 608% faster in Battlefield 6
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.89/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of core performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
26%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
21%
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Arc A350M Mar 30th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6800 Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
| Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
