Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6950 XT is 373 days older than the cheaper GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- Performs up to 36% better in F1 22 than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 216 vs 159 FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Up to 73% cheaper than Radeon RX 6950 XT - €513.05 vs €1866.66
- Up to 63% better value when playing F1 22 than Radeon RX 6950 XT - €3.23 vs €8.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT - 165 vs 335 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.64/FPS
37%
Price, €
€1866.66
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,866.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
159
73%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€513.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €513.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
46%
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$1099 | MSRP | $499 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1860 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2310 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |