Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 574 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 32% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - 45 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 M395X - 55 vs 75 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Crystal System | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |