Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 3009 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon Pro W6400 - 52 vs 49 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 50 vs 290 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Radeon R9 290X
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 290X
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
85.80238637887115%
Texel Fillrate
176 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
63.57954545454546%
AMD Radeon R9 290X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $549 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
