Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1006 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 123 vs 113 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 35 vs 190 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
66.3716814159292%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37.94747081712062%
AMD Radeon R9 285 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $249 | MSRP | $149 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| 918 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 1375 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
