Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3025 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Radeon R9 280X - 20 vs 16 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 50 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
32 GPixel/s
42.901193189435574%
Texel Fillrate
128 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
87.421875%
AMD Radeon R9 280X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $299 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 850 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
