Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3090 is 2373 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 200 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Performs up to 209% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R9 280 - 133 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 24 vs 3 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€7.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €7.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$279 | MSRP | $1499 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6X |
384-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1395 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |