Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1604 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than GeForce 210 - 91 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 3 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 31 vs 200 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €56.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |