Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3090 is 2520 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 115 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Performs up to 174% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon R7 260X - 189 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 24 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€8.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €8.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 440 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
9.272918861959958%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
11.079136690647482%
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$139 | MSRP | $1499 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1395 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |