Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2142 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 96% better in F1 22 than Radeon R7 260 - 96 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 6 vs 2 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€377.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €377.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$109 | MSRP | $229 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |