Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 100% better in Immortals of Aveum than Radeon R7 250 - 30 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 74692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
17.419962335216574%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
17.42201294879341%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |