Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 3586 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 55 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 2200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 250 - 23 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Radeon PRO W7500
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
13.60294117647059%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
15.546218487394958%
Radeon PRO W7500
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |
