Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 83% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €94.99 vs €566.21
- Up to 75% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €2.11 vs €8.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 49% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Radeon R7 240 - 67 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
45
67%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12853 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 12852 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |