Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 71% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 - €94.99 vs €330.06
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1660 - €2.88 vs €5.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 85% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 240 - 61 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
33
54%
Value, €/FPS
€2.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3032 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.41/FPS
53%
Price, €
€330.06
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €330.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $219 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |