Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 109 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 50 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 39 vs 34 FPS
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
35.944700460829495%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
43.13364055299539%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
| 730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
| 780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |
