Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 104 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 50 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 45 vs 41 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
31%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| 780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
