Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3100 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 1319 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Performs up to 15% better in Deathloop than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 47 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
47.987695462701865%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
