Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 64 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1222 days older than Radeon RX Vega 64.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 21% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon RX Vega 64 - 51 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 19 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 8 vs 1 GB
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
2.5267839094400646%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
1.263264274886306%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 230 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
| 10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| 625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
| 667 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |
