Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile is 758 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 52 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile - 35 vs 65 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
88.76923076923077%
Texel Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
88.74647526275314%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1082 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |