Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 620 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 175% better in Remnant II than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 33 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 6 vs 4 GB
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 74386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
22.951977401129945%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
22.960565038257798%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |