Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 777 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 148% better in The Last of Us Part I than GeForce GTX 1650 - 77 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 32 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 90% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6800 - €172.3 vs €1745.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Radeon Pro W6800 - €5.56 vs €22.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 75 vs 250 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.68/FPS
24%
Price, €
€1745.99
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,745.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
31
40%
Value, €/FPS
€5.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€172.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €172.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
23%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
16%
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$2249 | MSRP | $149 |
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2075 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2320 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |