Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 491 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6600.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 100 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 27% better in Valheim than Radeon Pro W6600 - 119 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6600 - €243.3 vs €301.18
- Up to 36% better value when playing Valheim than Radeon Pro W6600 - €2.04 vs €3.2 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €301.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
53%
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
$649 | MSRP | $289 |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
2580 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |