Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3025 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Radeon R7 250 - 98 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
19.841801850113956%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
26.452189454870418%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
