Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 264 days older than Radeon Pro 5500M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 85 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 28% better in Halo Infinite than Radeon Pro 5500M - 59 vs 46 FPS
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€531.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €531.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.4 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
81%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1450 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |