Key Differences
In short — Radeon 780M outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 780M is 1282 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 780M
- Performs up to 23% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 48 vs 39 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon 780M - 4 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
39
81%
Value, €/FPS
€3.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
22%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
30%
AMD Radeon 780M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Navi III IGP | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |