Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4707 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 99% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon X5680 - 488 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 16 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
