Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 4342 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 16% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon X5680 - 180 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |