Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4342 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 50% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon X5675 - 672 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5675 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
