Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4963 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5650 - 225 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5650 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |