Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4578 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon W3680 - 263 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
