Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4797 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 18% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3670 - 138 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3670 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |