Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4896 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3550 - 206 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3550 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
