Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 180 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 76 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W-3375 - 205 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 58 vs 270 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-3375 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 4 |
76 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
270 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |