Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon W-1290 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 622 days newer than Xeon W-1290.
Advantages of Xeon W-1290
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W-1290 - 479 vs 411 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon W-1290 - 58 vs 80 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
479
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 13th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-1290 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |