Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-11855M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 603 days newer than Xeon W-11855M.
Advantages of Xeon W-11855M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W-11855M - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-11855M - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W-11855M
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2021
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-11855M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
