Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4578 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 27% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5645 - 138 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£313.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £313.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |