In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690 v3
No clear advantages
Core i5-13600K
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6 – 121 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 125 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
121 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$371
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13600K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
86%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13600K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $2,090.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
