Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3530 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 56% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2687W - 717 vs 459 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
717
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |