Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 145 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |