Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2670
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 115 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2670 - 206 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1179.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 523 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |