Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 37% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2667 - 309 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
309
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£313.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £313.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8534 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |