Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4242 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 128% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2665 - 301 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 32 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
