Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 193 vs 164 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2511.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |