Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 103% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 488 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
