The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2623 v3
The Ryzen 9 5900X is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 5900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Xeon E5-2623 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2623 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
178
88%
Min 1% FPS
119
89%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, £
£233.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2623 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2623 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2623 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2623 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2623 v3 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$444.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
| 10 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
