Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 40% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 169 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
